“Isn’t it funny?
You know, when I came here 17 years ago and I said that I want to lead the campaign to get Britain to leave the EU, you all laughed at me.
Well, I have to say, you are not laughing now, are you?”
Now let me get something straight.
This guy has been going to work, as an elected official, with one goal in mind. And one goal only.
To undermine the very institution he was working for.
Not to improve it in any way but to simply dismantle it.
I’m not going to discuss here whether he is right about the shortcomings of the EU or not. (He is)
But I am going to question his modus operandi.
OK, he did point out, very astutely, which are the weak points of the European Union.
And then, instead of proposing ways to mend those problems, he did his ‘best’ to make matters even worse.
That was all that he could do in those circumstances. That’s it. Nobody’s perfect.
But why elect a guy like this, time and time again, into a position where he gets to be paid, handsomely, for making trouble?
And no, he wasn’t a ‘whistle-blower’. He never came forth with anything new.
He just kept milling around a few otherwise well known ideas – most of which are absolutely correct – and then turned them on their head, effectively morphing them into ‘seeds of doom’.
And yes, he was the guy “who has repeatedly criticised wasteful EU spending” and then used 58 000 pounds of EU money to cover a security bill “for just five events held in modest venues such as a darts arena in Essex where there was not a single demonstrator.“
Now go figure.
There are people out there who consider him to be “The Hero of Brexit”….